• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Medical Malpractice Litigation

Medical malpractice litigation can be complicated and time-consuming. Both plaintiffs and defendants are also legally required to pay an expensive price.

In order to win an award of money in a malpractice lawsuit, an injured patient must prove that negligent medical care resulted in injury. This involves establishing four legal elements which include professional duty and breach of duty, injury, and resulting damages.

Discovery

One of the most important elements of a medical negligence case is obtaining evidence via written interrogatories as well as requests for the production of documents. Interrogatories comprise of questions that the opposing party has to answer under oath, and are used to establish facts that can be presented in a trial. Requests for documents are used to request tangible items, such as medical records and test results.

In many cases, your attorney will interview the doctor who is in charge of the defense deposition that is recorded as a question and answer session. This allows your attorney to ask the witness or doctor questions that would not have been allowed at trial. It can be extremely useful in cases with experts as witnesses.

The information collected during pretrial discovery is used in court to prove the following elements of your claim:

Infraction to the standard of care

Injuries resulting from a breach of the standard of care

Proximate cause

Failure of a doctor to apply the knowledge and skills held by doctors in their field. This caused injury or harm to the patient

Mediation

Although medical malpractice cases are sometimes required, they come with significant negatives for both parties. For plaintiffs they are stressed, and the expense and the time commitment associated with a trial can cause psychological harm on them. For health professionals who are defendants, a trial could result in humiliation as well as a loss of respect. It could also have adverse effects on their career and practice since the financial benefits received in a pre-trial settlement are typically reported to national practitioner databanks and state medical licensing boards, and medical societies.

Mediation is the most cost-effective, efficient, and cost-effective method to settle the medical malpractice case. The parties can negotiate more freely since they don't have the cost of a trial, and the risk of juror verdicts to be eroded.

Before mediation, both parties provide the mediator with a brief of information on the case (a "mediation brief"). The parties will often permit their communication to be done through their lawyer, rather than directly between themselves at this stage since direct communications could be used against them later on in court. As the mediation process progresses, it is best to concentrate on the strengths of your case, and also be prepared to admit its weaknesses as well. This will allow the mediator to overcome any misunderstandings and provide you with a reasonable offer.

Trial

Tort reformers are working to establish a system that will compensate those injured by physician negligence quickly and without excessive costs. While this is a challenge however, many states have implemented tort reform measures in order to lower costs and prevent frivolous medical malpractice claims.

Most physicians in the United States carry malpractice insurance to safeguard themselves from allegations of professional negligence in medical cases. Certain policies may be required by a hospital or medical group to obtain permissions.

In order to be able to claim monetary compensation for injuries caused due to the negligence of a physician, the victim must prove that the doctor didn't meet the applicable standard of care in his or her field. This concept is called proximate causation, and is an important element of a medical malpractice case.

A lawsuit starts when a civil summons has been filed in the appropriate court. After this is done the parties must then engage in a process of disclosure. This includes written interrogatories as well as the production of documents such as medical records. Depositions (in which attorneys ask deponents under oath) and requests for admission are also involved.

The burden of proving medical malpractice cases is very high and the damages awarded are calculated based on both actual economic loss such as lost earnings and the costs of future medical treatment and noneconomic losses such as suffering and pain. When pursuing a claim for medical malpractice, it's important to work with a skilled lawyer.

Settlement

Medical malpractice cases are resolved through settlement. In general, the actual dollar value of a case is negotiated between the plaintiff and the defendants (often through or alongside the defendant's malpractice/professional liability insurer). The injured patient receives a check that is then paid to the plaintiff lawyer, who then deposits it into an account for escrow. The attorney then deducts case expenses and legal fees per the representation agreement, and the injured patient receives compensation.

To prevail in a medical negligence case, the patient who has suffered must demonstrate that a doctor or other healthcare professional was bound by a duty of care, breached the duty by failing to exercise the requisite degree of knowledge and competence in their field, that in direct consequence of the breach, the patient suffered injury, and these injuries can be quantified by the amount of money lost.

In the United States, there are 94 federal district court systems that are comparable to state trial courts. Each of these courts has an ad-hoc jury and judge panel that hears cases. In certain circumstances the case of medical malpractice may be moved to one of these courts. In the United States, physicians carry kalispell medical malpractice attorney malpractice insurance as a way to protect themselves from claims of injury that was not intended. Medical professionals should be aware of the structure and operation of our legal system so that they can react properly to any claim made against them.